Historical context
Prostitution has deep historical roots. In ancient cultures such as Sumer, there were legal distinctions between regular prostitutes and temple prostitutes, known as "naditu". In ancient Israel, prostitution was also common, despite prohibitions established by Jewish law.
Current situation
Prostitution remains illegal in Moscow, but this does not prevent it from thriving. According to the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs, there are about 130,000 prostitutes in Moscow, a quarter of whom are minors. In recent years, the number of prostitutes has increased significantly, which is due to economic and social factors.
Social and economic aspects
Prostitution in Moscow is often associated with criminal structures that control this business. Prostitutes work under the management of pimps, who decide on pricing and safety issues. The cost of prostitutes’ services can vary depending on the conditions and location of the service. For example, prostitutes renting luxury apartments may charge higher prices than those working in less prestigious conditions.
Legalization and control
The issue of legalizing prostitution in Russia has been discussed for a long time. Supporters of legalization argue that this will allow for control over the industry, collect taxes, and provide medical supervision of prostitutes. According to a survey conducted by the State Scientific Center for Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, 84% of doctors spoke in favor of legalizing prostitution, as this will help reduce the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
Cultural perception
Prostitution is also reflected in culture. Literature, cinema, and music often raise topics related to prostitution. This indicates that society continues to discuss and understand this phenomenon, despite its illegality.
Conclusion
Prostitution in Moscow remains a complex and controversial topic. Despite its illegality, it continues to exist and develop, influencing the social and economic life of the city. The issues of legalization and control over this activity remain relevant and require further discussion and resolution at the state level.